FOIA Request to the Supreme Court of the United States

[Chris Watson]

I am trying to get this out in such a way as to make it very public.  I need some assistance in this as I am unable at this time to set up a webpage that will allow people to sign on to the request.  Also, I need some assistance in getting this request spread to others who could add the weight of their email lists and Twitter/Facebook/G+ accounts.  If this request is known in the public and the media, then the request and it's very simple but important message will have a very large impact on policy and budgets and law in DC and New York.  What is missing is what is causing our Republic to become totalitarian and it is directly affecting the power of the Judicial Branch.

Please help or please pass this along to anyone you think might be interested in helping or further passing it along.  I would like to be able to send it to the Supreme Court with the weight of many people behind it but I do not need to be personally involved in the website or even the delivery!  If I can find no assistance, then I will send it to them alone by the First of March this year.

Thank you and anyone you send this to for your help and consideration.

The Text of the Request:



FOIA Request to the Supreme Court of the United States

The Government Printing Office (GPO) is the office responsible for the publication of the Laws as passed by the Congress of the United States and signed into Law by the Executive.  In the course of the history of this Nation the GPO has produced all of the text of the laws of the land except for those sections of text that have been omitted.

“Omission” is not the same as “Amended”, “Repealed” or “Superseded” as these acts require an act of Congress to implement.  “Omission” is simply a failure of the GPO to print and publish that section of the legal code.  But, for any court to rule on the law, the law must be in evidence in the Public Record.

The simple inaction of “Omission” effectively hobbles the Judicial Branch of our Government, and is a check on the power of the Judicial Branch of Government that is not a check by design of the founders, but is instead a check by negligence on the part of the GPO.

Since no Law that is not a part of the Public Record can be ruled on, so too is it true that no Law that is not in the Public Record can be enforced or acted upon in any way that is Legal or Lawful.

To effect law that is not in the Public Record is to effect secret rules and regulations and procedures and policies and is an act of tyranny by any member or branch of Government that does so.

Our Nation is holding a known deficit of at least 15 Trillion Dollars and that this debt is regulated and implemented via the policies and procedures outlined in the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.  But the section defining those policies and procedures as they occur between the Treasury Department of the United States and the semi-private Federal Reserve Bank are included in the body of text omitted in the Public Record under Title 12, Chapter 3, Subchapter XIII - “CIRCULATING NOTES AND BONDS SECURING SAME”.

The questions before the Supreme Court of the United States are thus:

1. What is the text of the Law enacted and entered into the Public Record?
2. What is the reason for the continued omission?
3. When did the omission occur and for how long have the People been effected by this Law?
4. Who is responsible for the omission(s)?
5. Who is Authorized to maintain the full text of the Public Law, and why have they been allowed to fail in this regard?
6. The original text of the Act as passed by Congress allowed for the bonding of Tangible Assets in the United States, and does not include People.  But for the National Debt to have been raised to such a degree, the People and their Value on account must have been secured.  Are the People of the United States owned by the Federal Reserve Bank and/or the Treasury or are they owed the value bonded by the Treasury and/or the Federal Reserve Bank as the Constitution describes as “The Good Faith and Credit”?

This last question is very important, as, if the law as passed is written for tangible assets only, and if the People have been bonded under this Act as it was written, then the Treasury Department of the United States has been engaging in the act of selling the People of the United States as sureties on the bonds without interest.  None of the tangible assets bonded have an interest in the bond.  If the People are treated in the Law as tangible assets, then the Law as passed cannot account for their natural interest in the Value on account.  This amounts to slavery and is unacceptable under the Constitution and laws forbidding such acts and trade.


Regardless of what the text omitted says or does not say, it is incumbent upon the Supreme Court of the United States to Stay any further acts of bondage by the Treasury until the full text of the law can be known and ruled upon.  This Stay should include all texts omitted in addition to the Title requested.